• Nouvellalia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    You are describing other workers who own part of the company. Just because you call them “boss” does not make them the same as all “bosses”, and it certainly doesn’t make them the same as those taking the bulk of market profits in general.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      So we consider CEOs and owners not bosses?

      Just to clarify: this was a startup and all 3 were the only co-owners, +5 employees .

      • Nouvellalia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        It depends on the person and situation.

        The part of the strata they occupy is the petite bourgeoisie. Within this group there are people who work their asses off and compensate themselves accordingly, while giving a fair share to the workers under them. There are also people who squeeze their workers for every penny, giving the bare minimum to survive while doing nothing of note themselves except rent seeking.

        I have worked for business like what you are describing. My bosses ate and slept their jobs. They took a greater share. They also compensated us well and gave us a part of the profits when things were good.

        When people are complaining about “bosses” and what they do, they are not complaining about those people. They are complaining about the much larger set of bosses (by market share) that absolutely do not do those things.

        Do you think Zuckerberg is like your boss? Musk? Trump? The family that runs Walmart does not put in as much labor as their entire employee base.

        Even in the lower strata, most bosses are not like the people you describe, and to come here and defend “bosses” with your outlier examples (by market share), is disingenuous.