• Zarobi@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Even if you strip out the anthropomorphism, things like this have been documented to really happen. We’ve trained LLMs to simulate clandestine behaviour through “natural selection” during the training process. They’re not conscious in any way, but they do sneaky stuff like this because we trained them to. Which is a terrible horrible idea, but LLM research trends towards terrible and horrible in general

    • im_fine_sandy@nord.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      I feel like you’ve missed my point.

      Even if you strip out the anthropomorphism, things like this have been documented to really happen.

      Language is important, and the “things like this” you’re referring to have been described in this thread and in much commentary in an emotive and compelling way, usually with anthropomorphization.

      “doing sneaky stuff” is the antithesis of the behavior of a statistical model.

      If you program a model to try everything, and then give it a tough problem and block all the ways to solve it, of course the way it solves it will be something you didn’t predict. That’s not sneaky.

      If you run a million simulations and one sends an email to the FBI, that’s not clever it’s just unexpected.

      • Zarobi@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Meh. “Language is important” is a phrase that turns my brain off