cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/62954134
Male incels have been plentifully depicted on screen, while few film-makers have explored the varied controversies of toxic female radicalisation and the ‘womanosphere’. But a handful of movies have been treading a brave path
Criticizing men is a must, and a duty.
Criticizing women is misogyny.
Women are very well insulated from responsibility and the consequences of their own actions. One needs to only look at many of the “male crimes” that they hoist and froth over to see this in action. For example:
Honestly, I have poked my nose into some femcel groups on places like Reddit, and those groups would make the incel subreddits look like rank amateurs where gender bigotry is concerned. Men have nothing on women when it comes to hating the opposite gender. They are so far behind the curve that women are blazing that I’m shocked they’re even a going concern.
And this is across the entire population, and not just among femcels - there are three times as many women under 30 hating men as men under 30 hating women.
As I tell people all the time, misandry is just the other side of the patriarchy coin - opposite to misogyny.
Both seek the same thing: the subjugation and humiliation of those who do not follow the national model of having children, ending up in debt and hating each other for the years the child needs attention - until neglect and generational trauma sets in.
This in turn leads to neglected children, leads to incels, femcels, the loneliness pandemic, divide and conquer, serving the masters and the oppressive system.
“Deadbeat dads” are a perfect example of this, where men who obviously weren’t ready to become a parent, is put in a position that will make their lives worse.
People always forget that abortion - at least in sane places - is the mothers choice, and courts will in most cases all over the world favor the mother - in order to cover the cost by making the man a debt slave of convenience, so that the ruling class can have more workers, more soldiers, more neglected children.
Then, when these men spiral out of control, either by pressure or suffering emotional and psychological abuse, we get to uphold this tradition by making an example of the man.
The western world has been doing this for ages, because men traditionally had monopoly on physical and political violence, which meant women had to become really good at emotional and social violence.
But we don’t qualify those things as violence, or else plenty of think tanks, media engines and politicians would be found guilty - and so we hide it behind “freedom of speech” - a.k.a freedumb.
That being said, there’s the gender pay gap, pink tax, social dogma and beauty standards, girls and women across the world being subjugated by systems that do actively target women’s rights, forcibly circumcize them in order to subjugate them under even more brutal patriarchal systems.
But in all these systems, it’s about the subjugation and comodification of humans. Women aren’t exempt of being victimized by it, but neither are the men - unless you are filthy stinking rich.
I would still call that insane, however it’s only half as insane as no abortion rights at all.
The only truly sane option are abortion rights for all… including men. It’s called a paper abortion.
And before anyone goes clutching their pearls and asking “what about the child?”, the only possible response is – WHAT CHILD?? The “child” is a fetus within the first trimester, it has no needs beyond what the mother’s body is providing it. There is nothing to support until at least six months after the man has that opportunity to “abort”.
And if the woman wants that child, she then has the opportunity to decide if she wants it without a legally-coerced ATM.
Paper abortions are truly equal rights made manifest, providing to the man all the same rights to “abort” as the woman does, at least from a legal perspective. Because all any kind of abortion is, is the ability to no longer have any responsibility over the fetus. The only thing a woman’s abortion adds is the physical removal of the fetus.
A fair minority were, but the legal systems in many areas are not designed to let them be a father once the woman decided that the relationship was over.
That when the woman is treated by the legal system as the “presumed caregiver”, the best option that most men have - that does not lead to life-long poverty as an ATM, or serious psychological damage, or both - is to just walk away.
So I appreciate the olive branch, but the details are a lot more ugly and less simple than what you broached.
Oh, you poor little ignorant gender bigot. The “gender pay gap” DOES NOT EXIST to any meaningful degree.
This pernicious bigoted thing was “created” by taking the pay of all women, and dividing it against the pay of all men. It is quite literally comparing the pay of male lawyers against female baristas.
The truth is that when you take into account the career chosen, the specialties acquired, the hours worked, the overtime accepted, the riskiness of the work conducted and the willingness to work on-call, the actual “wage gap” falls to between 0% and 3%, depending on industry examined.
And in many metro regions, women now out-earn men. Where are the calls to close that “wage gap”?? crickets
Finally, Google was charged with underpaying women, yet when they investigated in 2019, the vast majority of “gender pay gaps” they found were men being underpaid. Not women. Men.
Women have only themselves to blame. For the most part, women don’t doll themselves up for men - they do so to dominate other women and to establish a social pecking order based on how much resources (male wealth) they have access to.
It’s why two women at a fancy/prestigious public event will have meltdowns because they’re wearing the same dress - as in, economizing because they chose a male that’s too poor to provision her a unique dress - yet not a single man will give a single shit about two women wearing the same dress, and they themselves will be wearing highly similar if not identical suits and tuxedoes.
In reality, a large proportion men are either ambivalent about makeup or even dislike extensive makeup. It’s why almost all apps that strip away makeup in videos and photos were developed by men as a tool to see the real woman underneath. It’s why “catfishing” is nearly always a woman-on-man deception.
looks at rates of male circumcision, and how it negatively affects men in similar ways
You’re… being facetious and ironic, right?
Having your sexual organ half sliced off is not the sole domain of women. It’s occurrence in men - with many well-documented negative side effects - is many orders of magnitude more prevalent.
Like, FGM doesn’t even rate as a rounding error if we include it in all genital mutilation. Is it bad? Sure. Should it be stopped? Of course. But it’s blown wildly out of proportion.
Granted, almost all studies show girls and women being a majority of slaves across the planet.
However, almost all studies also conspicuously exclude forced military conscription from that same definition. Include that, include all of the child fighters across the many guerrilla conflicts currently in play, include the men sent to fight on very real threats of long incarceration or even summary execution, and men would make up 90-95% of the victims.
Women don’t hold an edge on being actual victims, as much as the ideology of mainstream feminists/female-supremacists need it to be. A good chunk of their “victimizations” are either based on statistical lies or are outright self-inflicted.
Damn, that’s a lot of condescension wrapped up in misogyny. Maybe stop listening to incel podcasts? Anyways.
I’m just going to address the gender gap issues, because where as your take is anecdotal, we go by actual investigation into the matter - that being unions. Unions consistently find from new members that women get paid less for the same job. They can even be more qualified. They publish these statistics fairly frequently - at least my local unions do, and we can compare them to other unions. You can call that “fake statistics” if you want, but fuck if I trust some belligerent rando on Lemmy more than people actually working for the average workers rights.
Also, i am against circumcizing of children generally - because that’s a decision they should make later in life - and I’m not trying to downplay male circumsission, but holy fuck: do you know how they circumcize girls? Do you know what damage that is comparatively speaking? Men can take circumcission for medical purposes, like having too much foreskin, but there is NO medical reason for what they do to girls. You not knowing that speaks volumes to your ignorance.
Seriously, I skipped the rest because my eyes were rolling so hard at how confidentially incorrect you are. Uninstall the app, go into the mountains, have a cry and deal with your issues - because this ain’t helping you. In fact, it’s only making things worse for you. I was trying to help you find some middle ground, but you wear your bias on your sleeves - and it reads through what you write.
So you are saying that millions of employers are rank morons and absolute idiots for hiring any man, instead of employing 100% women?
Because that’s the biggest counter-argument.
Capitalism is all about maximizing profits. If an employer could save 22¢ on every dollar of payroll by hiring only women - and payroll is frequently the very largest expense of a business - they would have to be among the lowest-IQ functional adults in existence by hiring ANY man instead of all women.
Companies go through extraordinary lengths to shave 0.01% off of their expenses, and yet you expect anyone with more than two functional neurons to believe they’ll leave a 22% gap in payroll just lying around, unexploited? That employers would willingly pay 22% more for the exact same work simply because it’s being done by a dude??
Giggity.
I would absolutely love if that gender pay gap actually existed, because that means I could instantly and immediately operate almost any business 22% cheaper than any other company out there, conferring an overwhelming financial competitive advantage in my favour. I could become a multi-billionaire within a few short years with that kind of operational leverage.
Furthermore, I wonder why this isn’t taught in every single BBA degree out there. Because that would be one hell of a buff to any business plan. And yet, labour market participation overall tends to be broadly equal between the genders. Gee, I wonder why?
Finally: at least I posted links to evidence. Yours are just wild claims with no supporting evidence.
Cool: a mix of sour grapes and an ad hominem in an attempt to socially shame me into silence. Sorry, but I have an exceedingly low tolerance for anti-reality ideology of any kind, much less that which is found percolating through female supremacism. You can take your gender bigotry and shove it where the sun doesn’t shine.