Fossy@programming.dev to Today I Learned@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-222 days agoTIL that a man killed his daughter in Texas after arguing about Donald Trump. The local jury refused to indict him. He was immediatly released.abc6onyourside.comexternal-linkmessage-square247linkfedilinkarrow-up11Karrow-down135file-textcross-posted to: politics@lemmy.worldgestapo_usa@lemmy.dbzer0.com
arrow-up1968arrow-down1external-linkTIL that a man killed his daughter in Texas after arguing about Donald Trump. The local jury refused to indict him. He was immediatly released.abc6onyourside.comFossy@programming.dev to Today I Learned@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-222 days agomessage-square247linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: politics@lemmy.worldgestapo_usa@lemmy.dbzer0.com
minus-squarefake@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·22 days agoGiven that grand jury indictment rates are like >90%, what’s actually being achieved here?
minus-squareZannsolo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·22 days agoThat’s probably a pretty good rate considering probable cause is the bar.
minus-squarefake@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·22 days agoAlso given there’s no defence, I should hope they could almost always win a completely uncontested review of evidence.
minus-squarethe_crotch@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·21 days ago+/-10% of cases with bullshit evidence aren’t going to trial
Given that grand jury indictment rates are like >90%, what’s actually being achieved here?
That’s probably a pretty good rate considering probable cause is the bar.
Also given there’s no defence, I should hope they could almost always win a completely uncontested review of evidence.
+/-10% of cases with bullshit evidence aren’t going to trial
Well, look at the article…