Consumption of products is the furthest one can be from participation in such things in many cases, or not far off.
Completely disagree. There’s an important caveat: Necessary consumption of products is the furthest one can be from participation. Most of the consumption done in the western world is not necessary.
Honestly ridiculous how you try to equate these things.
That’s okay. I don’t necessarily expect someone to condemn themselves.
Completely disagree. There’s an important caveat: Necessary consumption of products is the furthest one can be from participation.
We already know that you pretend that buying a product made by NATO is just as bad as being a torturer in Abu Ghraib.
Simply consuming things is, indeed, either the furthest one can be from relevant participation, or not far off. The fact that you keep equivocating that with going overseas to murder children simply betrays that you do not see people outside of NATO as people.
Also, you even think that consumers of meat are more at fault for producing meat than the people involved in producing meat, which is extremely silly.
That’s okay. I don’t necessarily expect someone to condemn themselves.
Cute, especially considering that I do not live in “the western world” (i.e. the Imperial Core), and neither does most of the world whom you claim it’s okay to invade. “It’s just as bad to buy meat as it is to orchestrate Highways of Death”, lol.
You are equating purchasing things with directly participating in the most vile military on the planet.
I hate to break it to you, but your consumption of unethical products is also direct participation in the unethical production of said products.
Consumption of products is the furthest one can be from participation in such things in many cases, or not far off.
Unlike working in a NATO military.
Honestly ridiculous how you try to equate these things.
Completely disagree. There’s an important caveat: Necessary consumption of products is the furthest one can be from participation. Most of the consumption done in the western world is not necessary.
That’s okay. I don’t necessarily expect someone to condemn themselves.
We already know that you pretend that buying a product made by NATO is just as bad as being a torturer in Abu Ghraib.
Simply consuming things is, indeed, either the furthest one can be from relevant participation, or not far off. The fact that you keep equivocating that with going overseas to murder children simply betrays that you do not see people outside of NATO as people.
Also, you even think that consumers of meat are more at fault for producing meat than the people involved in producing meat, which is extremely silly.
Cute, especially considering that I do not live in “the western world” (i.e. the Imperial Core), and neither does most of the world whom you claim it’s okay to invade. “It’s just as bad to buy meat as it is to orchestrate Highways of Death”, lol.