• anomnom@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    They had at least one pit stop to cool the batteries and motors, which involved 3 people working on the thing for 30-50 seconds.

    Still sort an impressive engineering, but really humanoid robots are stupid. A motorized wheelchair could hose these things.

    • worhui@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Bipedal robots make sense only because the infrastructure around was made for humans. Wheeled and tracked robots can have trouble though spaces designed for humans. Designing with wheelchair access is mind had to happen on purpose. A small set of stairs or uneven terrain can create a big challenge.

      • JustTesting@lemmy.hogru.ch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Even for that, 4 legs like the robot dogs is easier/more stable. Plus purpose built robots that don’t need to move are generally cheaper and make more sense, like a dishwasher.

        and ten 500 bucks purpose built robots are cheaper than one 20-50k humanoid robot that does tasks slowly and needs a human remote operator for most of them

      • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Have you seen bipedal robots en countering terrain they haven’t been carefully calibrated and programmed for?

        One of the “runners” tripped on a power line and basically exploded while flailing on the ground.

        Dean Kamen solved wheelchairs going up stairways decades ago.

        I’m not saying it’s impossible, but automation of tasks like cleaning and bed making or driving are better suited to specialized designs like roombas and the sensor suites on cars.