abbiistabbii@piefed.blahaj.zone to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoPOV: You just said something the Tesseract Developer didn't likepiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square51linkfedilinkarrow-up1464arrow-down112
arrow-up1452arrow-down1imagePOV: You just said something the Tesseract Developer didn't likepiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneabbiistabbii@piefed.blahaj.zone to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square51linkfedilink
minus-squareRememberTheApollo_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoDisagree. It takes the reins off the easily corruptible. Once there are no or severely limited consequences for actions we get to see who people really are. Also it’s highly probable that the easily corruptible are drawn to power.
minus-squareFolstar@lemmus.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·1 day ago“Disagree. Agree. Agree again. Agree with the tacit point being made.” -you for some reason
minus-squareRememberTheApollo_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·21 hours agoThat’s not what I said. “Revealing corruption” is not the same as granting ability to corruptible people. Your sarcasm is inverse to your comprehension.
Disagree. It takes the reins off the easily corruptible. Once there are no or severely limited consequences for actions we get to see who people really are. Also it’s highly probable that the easily corruptible are drawn to power.
“Disagree. Agree. Agree again. Agree with the tacit point being made.” -you for some reason
That’s not what I said. “Revealing corruption” is not the same as granting ability to corruptible people.
Your sarcasm is inverse to your comprehension.