After several months, I finally finished watching the entire Twin Peaks series and the movie Fire Walk with Me. For me, there’s no doubt that it’s a masterpiece, in fact, I think the movie can only be understood after watching the third season. What do you think of Twin Peaks? Do you think you understood it? What’s your take on it?

  • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    EDIT to add that there’s a TP community here on Lemmy. It’s quiet, but it’s a place folk on this thread might find both wonderful and strange…

    https://lemmy.world/c/twinpeaks !twinpeaks@lemmy.world

    At its frequent best, it’s the finest TV around. It had a very rocky spell in the second half of season 2, but the final episode of that season was a masterpiece.

    I absolutely love Season 3 as well.

    IMO though, the film, Fire Walk With Me is the absolute pinnacle of the world of Twin Peaks, and indeed of Lynch’s output. I don’t really agree that you need to see Season 3 to understand FWWM, it’s pretty straightforward if you know the first two seasons fairly well, but I certainly think it adds an interesting further dimension to the film.

    I’ll take this opportunity to plug a SUPERB video series on the show from a creator called Joel Bocko, who goes by Lost in the Movies on YT. His work is always fascinating, but the thing he’s best known for is his absolutely epic series Journey Through Twin Peaks. It’s a 40-chapter (and still growing) series covering the show, less from a “let’s work out the puzzles and clues” point of view and more from a cinematic, thematic and emotional perspective, including comparisons with old movies which may have influenced Frost and Lynch.

    It’s marvellous, and deserves a hell of a lot more attention than it gets (and certainly more than the notorious 4 hour Twin Perfect video)

  • Apeman42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    That it’s probably time to go watch it again and see if it holds my interest well enough to watch the third season. I’ve seen the first two and maybe the movie? But that was easily 15 years ago.

    If nothing else though, Kyle MacLachlan is a treasure to watch and an absolute dreamboat.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      Likewise in fallout; he’s aging REALLY well and I hate that he looks younger than I do despite me being literally decades younger. Lol

      • Apeman42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Oh my. I’ve only seen like 2 episodes of fallout and forgot he was in the first one, so I just looked him up and other than some extra silver he appears to have barely aged from when he played the mayor on Portlandia 10-15 years ago.

    • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Would strongly advise watching the movie before S3 (but after S1 and 2) to get the most out of the final season.

    • skvlp@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Be aware that season 3 is completely different. In fact Lynch considered it a separate thing (The Return) instead of season 3. While The Return has great moments and ardent fans, I think it’s good to know you’ll be in for a different ride.

  • ArseAssassin@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    There’s a scene in season 3 that lasts minutes showing nothing but a guy sweeping up the Roadhouse while Green Onions by Booker T & The M.G.'s is playing in the background. I watched the whole thing. I could not imagine anyone but David Lynch getting away with something like that on TV.

  • Mister Neon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m not a fan. I just don’t like anything David Lynch has made outside the original Dune movie. I can’t really defend my position, it’s just a personal taste thing.

  • boletus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I like it mostly because the characters are incredibly easy to care about and connect to, and the depiction of a small town in the pacific northwest is so enchanting. It feels like a soap opera at times but in the best way possible.

    The rest of it is incomprehensible but it really adds to the dreaminess of it all.

    I respect any piece of media that executes on an artists vision, and twin peaks is so Lynchian that it deserves at least a try.

    Also find it interesting how it’s almost impossible to fit it into an archetype. You can almost never guess if someone will like Twin Peaks or not.

  • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I think anyone who claims to fully understand it can be safely ignored. It’s not supposed to be understood, it’s supposed to be felt. Lynch intentionally tries to invoke a dreamlike feeling, where things simultaneously feel internally consistent and incomprehensibly bizarre. There are certainly things to understand, but there are also things which are meant more to inspire an idea of something that could be understood, without having a concrete explanation. That’s part of the magic.

    I think the middle of season 2, when he stepped away to work on Blue Velvet, is frustratingly weak, but they got there in the end. I think The Return was good, but not quite as good.

    Overall I love it and reference it frequently.

    • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Blue Velvet was released in 1986, years before TP. I think you mean Wild at Heart, as it’s frequently said that he left the show to work on that. However that’s not actually the case either. He just stepped back from the show because he was unhappy with being forced to reveal the killer.

  • Domi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s probably my favourite piece of media ever. I’ve never seen anything else that is able to blend comedy, surrealism, horror and satire into one thing the way twin peaks does. I’ve definitely allowed to become a core part of my personality.

  • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Pointlessly pretentious. Powered through the whole thing because it’s supposed to be good and. It’s not.

    Its like having a conversation with an idiot that think using exclusively polysyllabic words makes them smart.

    Also the part where all the highschool girls end up in relationships with 30+ year old men is certainly something.

  • Fondots@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I guess I like the plaid tops more than the hooters tank tops, but otherwise it’s just standard chain restaurant food. Nothing too special.

  • orenj [he/they]@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Love the music, and liked what i saw of the first season, but I haven’t continued watching it for whatever reason; I typically do not watch television in general though.

  • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Season 1 is excellent. I rewatch it every year or two.

    Season 2 is a struggle at times. I do rewatch it, just not as often.

    Season 3 I’ve only watched once when it aired, but remember liking it. I’m due for a rewatch of it soon. It however didn’t capture the same kind of magic as Season 1.

    Fire Walk With Me is a necessary viewing, but I’ve always been on the fence about how I felt about it. Or rather, if I felt it was a necessary installment.

    • skvlp@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I find season 1 to be consistently great.

      For me season 2 lacks the consistency and it’s quality varies a lot. I find the best of season 2 to be incredible, but I also find the worst of season 2 to be drab and poor.

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Look up which season 2 episodes Lynch was involved in, and which ones he wasn’t. For me, the drop in quality perfectly aligns with his brief departure.

        • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s true, but also it suffers from the fact that they were forced to reveal the killer mid season, thus robbing the show of its core dramatic driver. For a while they just didn’t know what to do with the world they’d built.