• undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 minutes ago

    It doesn’t have to be that way but it currently is, and that’s why Americans don’t take trains. Have you seen Amtrak? It’s like an 1800’s coal train; the LA Metro (light rail) is great if you want to get stabbed by a tweaker on the way to work.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      I used to take Amtrak between Philly and DC. It took about 2 hours which is a bit shorter than driving if you’re lucky enough to not hit major traffic. The problem was that if it rained you had water pouring into the car from multiple spots in the ceiling. Just an amazing thing to see in 200-year-old technology. Even Amish buggies don’t leak like that.

      I thought about taking the Acela on that route once. Cost 4X as much and shaved a whopping 10 minutes off the time.

      • Spitefire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        I do not understand Amtrak at all. The Keystone has been the absolute best thing about moving back east for me. $25 to Manhattan, grab a bagel, see a show, $25 home. And the Keystone is the crappy commuter train, the Pennsylvanian is way nicer. I’ve done it tons of times and it’s only been late once, and no leaks on the rain.

        Getting to DC costs hundreds each way and isn’t any faster than driving. I’m better off buying a ticket to Baltimore and then taking the $7 commuter to DC…