implying children aren’t a financial burden implies you’re wealthy.
the original post says ‘cost’ and the other person goes ‘cost isn’t a reason for me’.
so i go ‘ok how much do you make that cost isn’t a reason for you?’ because the legit reason for the vast majority of folks, is the cost. they can’t afford kids, so they don’t have them.
implying children aren’t a financial burden implies you’re wealthy.
the original post says ‘cost’ and the other person goes ‘cost isn’t a reason for me’.
so i go ‘ok how much do you make that cost isn’t a reason for you?’ because the legit reason for the vast majority of folks, is the cost. they can’t afford kids, so they don’t have them.
No, the other person said cost is not the highest on the list.
You’re the one crusading for it to be “not a reason”.