The mayor was inside the residence at the time, the police department said later Saturday

The NYPD’s Bomb Squad confirmed that the devices thrown in the direction of New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s home were both viable IEDs.

The incident is now under investigation by both the NYPD and the FBI. In total, two devices were thrown during the protests on Saturday afternoon on Manhattan’s swanky Upper East Side.

On Sunday, police spokesperson Jessica Tisch said that the “preliminary analysis of a device that was ignited and deployed at a protest yesterday has determined that it is not a hoax device or a smoke bomb.”

“It is, in fact, an improvised explosive device that could have caused serious injury or death,” Tisch added.

  • rozodru@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    click bait headline and post.

    It was an Fascist Protest held by Nazi Jake Lang against Muslims. two counter protesters were the ones who tossed the IEDs. they WERE NOT directed at the Mayors home but at the Nazi’s that were protesting nearby.

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Terrorism with IEDs is a threat to safety of all and to democracy, even if it is directed at nazis.

      Also, what do you think the Nazis do next?

        • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          You’re conflating state sponsored violence with random Nazi supporters joking them as private malitia.

          Absolutely violence should not be avoided where violence is already being used. However, by all account these nazis were protestors, not the agents of the government.

          Nazis are still people and there is still a spectrum of violence and beliefs. In the Nazi bar analogy, they all end up being nazis by virtue of association and tolerance of Nazi views. You’re making the leap to all being Nazis immediately.

          Non violent far right protestors have the right to protest and their beliefs. Where they have already perpetrated violence, they should receive it in kind or, ideally prosecution.

          The use of IED is not that and just normalises it’s use. Which side has the bigger propensity for violence and bombing of unarmed civilians?

          The Dems and the left have a problem where they tut tut and pearl clutch rather than taking action. Jumping to bombing protests is not the answer, however distasteful those protests are.

            • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              That’s my point. When you lose your humanity, you are no better. The whole point of fascism is to ‘other’ different in and out groups. Exactly what you’re doing, to the point where you think terrorism is ok.

  • plateee@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Remember when liberals were so pissed off at Mayor Adams that they threw a pipe bomb at his house? No?

    Huh. Weird.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    We have a domestic terrorist problem, and it is exactly who it has been since the Oklahoma City bombing.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I remember when OK City happened, and EVERYBODY immediately started blaming the Muslims, but it didn’t sit right with me. Why Oklahoma? Most Muslims have never heard of Oklahoma. It seemed like a target of opportunity, rather than a target designed to have the most propaganda effect.

      And then they caught them a few days later, and sure enough, they were homegrown, right-wing whack-jobs.