Something like “sets that aren’t even hypercomputable aren’t real”. Inventing proper classes, which are like sets but randomly can’t go in other things, is a pretty lame solution, anyway. Although, it can probably emulate the former approach, and it’s easy to describe.
mathematical expressions are evaluated on a computer hardware (the brain), that in “normal” cases eventually converges on a result. but sometimes it starts oscillating instead.
What’s your solution for Russell’s paradox?
Something like “sets that aren’t even hypercomputable aren’t real”. Inventing proper classes, which are like sets but randomly can’t go in other things, is a pretty lame solution, anyway. Although, it can probably emulate the former approach, and it’s easy to describe.
Source: I have some flab some places.
mathematical expressions are evaluated on a computer hardware (the brain), that in “normal” cases eventually converges on a result. but sometimes it starts oscillating instead.
To rely on people more competent than me on such matters of importance.