You have an expectation of privacy in location data that reveals your movements in the physical world, and even short-term surveillance of these movements is a search subject to the Fourth Amendment, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled today in Chatrie v. United States. The case involved geofence warrants...
naw without that they would need location tracking to not be protected. but as long as alternative ways to track location exists then sure, let them believe they aren’t being tracked. its good publicity.