What I find really interesting is that the MAGA type are literally incapable of defending Trump on his own merits, they always resort to some sort of logical fallacy that deflects, distracts, or misinterprets. It implies that they are in some degree aware that Trump is indefensible, but they defend him anyway because they’re brain dead and their entire ethos is built around dishonesty.
Don’t forget the racism. Dishonesty and racism.
Trump raped babies and Republicans still love him. So…
Of course liberals are going to be mad, hes just going to rape it.
If Trump raped a baby on live television, live streamed for the entire world to see, MAGAts would still be protecting a pedophile and try to rationalize it.
And even in the hypothetical, he was trying to molest the baby and he was the one who set the house on fire
Because he would have set the house on fire himself 5 minutes prior
Trump’s first term teemed with moments that Trump did the right thing (they were rare, but, y’know, the broken clock rule) and left-wing pundits would say yeah, it’s good that Trump did that.
Then he’d tweet something obnoxious about it. Or when he was thrown off Twitter, would Truth his obnoxious commentary. Sometimes it was about him taking credit, or regretting that he had to do that thing, or walking back is rational statements in favor of irrational ones.
But there were a lot of pundits who believed principle over loyalty, and would give Trump credit when it was due.
Trump’s first term teemed with moments that Trump did the right thing (they were rare, but, y’know, the broken clock rule)
I think “teemed with” suggests that it was “overflowing with”. Which is like the opposite of “rare”.
True. I was saying that the pundits teemed with praise for Trump, not that Trump’s positive acts teemed themselves.
I could totally have worded it better.
I remember someone saying in the first term that “If he took a shit at the Resolute Desk they’d still defend him.”
Then it literally happened. And they did.
If Trump went into a burning building the heat would react with the bronzer and he would be laminated into immobility. Not that there’s any chance the coward would be anywhere near the fire.
No, he would kick the shit out of that fire. And then give it $300 billion.
Ben Shapiro starts every other sentence with “let’s imagine xyz for the sake of argument…”
It’s funny
Here in Australia our far right wing pollie had a poster unroll behind her, and our exaggerators now are using the “what if it’s a bomb” thing.
And I’ve been arguing the exact same. It wasn’t, no chance of it. Police don’t screen for embarrassing posters
In the UK after Nigel Farage had a milkshake thrown at him, for the second time, he actually tried to claim that it was a dangerous assault because it could have been acid.
You know because milkshake is well known for transmuting into acid en route, everyone knows that. It’s a miracle anyone dares drink it really.
I’m absolutely horrified at how that horrible bitch is growing in popularity
Gina bought 10% of channel 7.
I wouldn’t necessarily believe her popularity. I’ve definitely seen a lot of comments that are definitely bots or lobbyists
The second something says they watch 7 or 9 “news”, I instantly lose respect for them
10 is barely any better
The only reason Trump would save a baby is if he was attracted to it. Which he is.
Indeed and at least the Italian Prime Minister, Meloni, finally had enough of the orange sack of shit. The US giving up to Iran at Versaille, sigh,…stay classy MAGA.
They aren’t fake, they are conspiracy theories fuelled by ketamine.
Yes, if you were a member of a pedophile ring and used your political power to see that no participants were ever even investigated for the crimes, and you saved a baby from a burning house, I would still be mad at you for that first thing.
