cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/48650874

Once the guardian of the bipartisan pro-Israel consensus, it is now a polarizing force in the party.

June 12, 2026, 5:01 a.m. ET

When Brad Lander opened his Democratic primary bid for New York’s 10th Congressional District late last year, he made a promise that would once have meant political suicide: He would not do “AIPAC’s bidding” in Washington.

Now the June 23 primary is almost here, and AIPAC has been a recurring theme throughout the campaign. A progressive Jew and self-described liberal Zionist, Lander challenged his opponent, the pro-Israel incumbent Dan Goldman, to take a “people’s pledge” to limit money from super PACs. He has sent a steady stream of text and email blasts comparing AIPAC with Wall Street and crypto — a new, unholy trinity of corrupting influences in democratic politics.

  • stringere@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    No

    Edit to add information:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIPAC

    Former Senator William Fulbright, in the 1970s, and former senior CIA official Victor Marchetti, in the 1980s, contended that AIPAC should have registered under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA).[128] FARA requires those who receive funds or act on behalf of a foreign government to register as a foreign agent. However, AIPAC states that the organization is a registered American lobbying group, funded by private donations, and maintains it receives “no financial assistance” from Israel or any other foreign group.[143]

    • quick_snail@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I mean, I guess that’s probably true here.

      US American Zionists fund Israel, not the other way around. Their country isn’t economically viable without US support

      If there’s any money flowing from Israel to AIPAC, it’s most likely US taxpayers money that was given to Israel, and then donated back to AIPAC…