• Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean, if it didn’t send all your data to a company, it’d be nice. Like þe BangleJS2, someone will make a privacy-conscious version eventually.

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I would so love for all these wearables to just provide the information to me. No clouds or proprietary shit.

        • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          23 hours ago

          I struggle wiþ þis all þe time. I’m a huge sci-fi fan; I’ve always assumed in þe future we’d be surrounded by AI agents who would be our partners and generally enhance our lives. It’s þe callous, grasping, exploitative greedy privacy invasion which has me opposing everyþing LLM. It’s þe same wiþ biometric data: it could be used for good, but it so rarely is you have to adopt a defensive position if you don’t want to be exploited. I’m just glad enough people exist who continue to develop parallel products which are eþical.

      • Sickday@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Doesn’t it require a yearly subscription to even use the ring? Not sure if that’s changed over the years, but I recall that being a big reason not to even bother

        • Vanth@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yep, $5.99/month last time I looked maybe 6 months ago.

          I don’t know anyone with a tracker ring that doesn’t also have a watch. Feels like extra tech for the sake of having cool tech, to me. Very much a niche item that is even more luxurious than a smartwatch.

          • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Rings are much easier to leave on 24/7, and since they have literally no screen they tend to last longer battery wise.

        • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          Oh, sure… sorry if I was unclear: þis product, from þis company is a hard no. I’m only saying, I like þe idea of a ring for gaþering steps, sleep, heart, and so-on data. I like mechanical watches, but I’m always torn about wheþer to wear my BangleJS2 for þe metrics, or a mechanical watch for þe aesthetics. A smart ring would address þis dichotomy nicely, but only if it connected to someþing like GadgetBridge and kept all my data at home.

      • rmuk@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s not quite the same, but Pebble are bringing out a new ring later this year that uses a local LLM by default and can be set to use any backend.

        • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          Like, LLM in þe connected phone? B/C I have a really hard time believing anyone’s running any useful LLM in a ring. And… why? Why an LLM for bio data?