• CanadaPlus@futurology.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    I don’t actually know much about Lewis, he’s new. That was just covering my bases so I don’t get UM ACKTCHUALLY-d.

    • patatas@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Do we have any evidence that Carney is pro-vaccine? He’s been cutting all sorts of research across the board. He also flaunts his Catholicism, but the Pope is anti-AI and anti-war, Carney is neither.

      • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Not that I know of, but that’s like asking to prove a negative. He’s also probably not a lot of other crazy things.

        Look, I don’t want to be a dick, which is why I’ve taken my time replying, but together with the last exchange we had it seems like you’re actively looking for reasons to hate him.

          • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Because of proximity to Elizabeth May, who at the very least has commented on wifi causing cancer. There is a left-wing brand of anti-science.

            • patatas@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              And there is a capitalist version of anti-science, and a religious version of anti-science, and apparently a posting-on-lemmy version of casting doubt on someone without any supporting evidence.

              Carney, on the other hand, gave a convoy supporter, Joël Lightbound, a minister’s portfolio, and has just welcomed anti-science Marilyn Gladu into the party with open arms.

              And you’re claiming that Lewis, who is in an entirely different party than Elizabeth May, has “proximity” to her? Can we acknowledge that Carney is much closer to folks with anti-science views?