• JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Yup, I’ve been doing that for a while now. It’s not a new feature, but maybe it happened in the past few years?

    • Skavau@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Idk when it came in. They probably announced it on their site somewhere when it came in.

      Ironically enough, I’d argue the fact that public profiles are forced to be public on the Fediverse is going to be more offputting to your average user compared to the complexities of federation.

      • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I did a little digging, and it looks like it went live on June 3rd, last year. [Announcement] So yeah, whoops-- it’s a little more recent than I thought.

        As noted, however, it’s not broadly called “curation”; it merely falls under such user option tools. “Curation” is a much wider set of options that can apply in multiple ways.

        Btw, thanks for ObscureMusic. Didn’t know about it, but just subscribed!

        EDIT: At the moment, dunno how much concern there is about things being public on the FV. It can be pretty hard for trackers to pull everything together it seems (for search engines anyway), that I suppose it’s not a major concern just yet?

        • Auster@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          About profiles being public on the fediverse, everything’s possible with enough will. And if someone’s willing to chase another someone down, I’d imagine there’s enough will to track down everything that is shared by this other one. And I can think of some rather feasible ways that tracking can be done anonymously.

          • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            For sure.
            I kind of hand-waved the issue away, above, but I fear you’re absolutely correct.

            Indeed, it’s really not that hard to imagine some programming being put together (perhaps aided with a bit of AI), to absolutely track down and dox just about anyone using careless little hints we typically leave behind when we assume we’re being relatively anonymous, online.

            And then, if a bad actor, using password-breaking tools to cause all kinds of mayhem, even possibly breaking in to our online banking accts and so forth. But also, if a govt entity, gaining all kinds of info and insight in to our lives.

            It’s actually kind of terrifying, and the tools for such already exist. I guess Palantir’s already doing so…?

            • Auster@thebrainbin.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Wouldn’t doubt intelligence services from who knows how many countries are keeping an eye here, or even companies such as Meta (even if in their case, without Threads). Maybe an ill-intended individual or a monitoring entity doesn’t even have their own instances.

              • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                12 hours ago

                It’s an important discussion for responsible web-use IMO, however late in the game we generally might be upon such shizzle.

                For example, I run uMatrix blocker extension so I can see and control every little javascript a site tries to run, and I note that Facebook’s and Google’s shit are almost everywhere, across ~90% of modern websites. It’s… pretty ridiculous.

        • Skavau@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Yeah, it’s not curation.

          EDIT: At the moment, dunno how much concern there is about things being public on the FV. It can be pretty hard for trackers to pull everything together it seems (for search engines anyway), that I suppose it’s not a major concern just yet?

          It’s not a widely opposed aspect of the Fediverse currently, but if a wave of Redditors came here - given how many choose to hide their profile, many 100% would complain.

          • phatpipe69@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            hold the fuck on a second. why did I have to give an email when i signed up?? it actually almost put me off entirely. I’ve been using Mirage the last few weeks and it didn’t ask me for anything when signing up and seems much more privacy centred. This was after being banned on reddit. are you telling me you didn’t need an email to sign up here?

            • TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              I did not. Caveat: I signed up on reddthat.com and lemmus.org. (It’s actually kind of cute: “What if I don’t want to give you my email?” “Great! You don’t have to! We don’t even want your email!.”)

              I note that something called the lemmyclub does demand your email.