I was inspired by today’s XKCD text: “Scientists occasionally invent alternative periodic table layouts, which is usually a sign that they don’t have enough enrichment in their enclosures.” (emphasis mine)

If we spend nearly all of our time alone, what kinds of “enrichment” do we need to keep ourselves from going crazy?

I assume ethical research here would be difficult to find, but it seems like there could be observational studies of prisoners, scientists at isolated outposts, etc. I wonder how many work-from-home people are keeping themselves in conditions that would be considered unethical if those conditions were forced on them.

(I’m not doing as badly as this post would imply – it’s just a slow Friday here :) )

EDIT: People seem to be really fixating on the prison thing. It was an example of a place where people can feel isolation and still be monitored. I am aware that my home is not a prison.

I work from home. I like working from home. Sometimes I get lonely or bored, and I wondered what science said I should do to ensure I’m having the best experience possible.

@LurkingLuddite@piefed.social nailed the intent of my question. It was meant to ask about research-backed positive things that people should ensure they are doing.

  • Jul (they/she)@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    16 days ago

    I don’t consider my home anything like prison. I’m not isolated. I just don’t have to be in person with work people. Has no effect on my social life. And actually I get more work done because I’m not constantly interrupted. It’s no different than before cubicles and open office plans when people could close their office door. Remote work is absolutely nothing like isolation or even close to the lack of freedom and constant danger that makes prison so horrible.