• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not really…

      Slurs are disparaging comments either false or twisting true information to appear negative.

      It’s like “mud slinging” in politics, because “slur” is literally an old word for “mud” and “slurring someone” was “throwing mud at them”.

      If someone is a bigot, and you call them a bigot…

      You’re not throwing mud on them, you’re hosing them down so everyone can see exactly who/what they are.

      Like, I get how someone would use it like you did, and I know I’m often overly pedantic…

      Arguably “bigot” is already a slur

      The only time bigot is a slur, is if the person isn’t actually a bigot. An example would be getting called a bigot or antisemitic for saying Israel is committing genocide. That’s the only time “bigot” would be a slur, if it was a lie.

  • DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    wt:MAGAt: both words rhyme with a word for a “bundle of sticks or brushwood intended to be used for fuel tied together for carrying.” Apparently this word I’m not mentioning has other definitions by British and Irish.

    • Aberration13@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Hmm, there is a similarity but it doesn’t quite rhyme, could still be contributing to the feel of the word though for sure.