Yeah, sand definitely is much harder than teeth (which in a normal vertebrate are based on apatite, at a Mohs hardness of 5). If it’s abrasion, that explains a bit, although it’s going to be much slower than an actual cutting action. A quick search indicates cement is at Mohs 5-7, so you theoretically could chew through an unusually soft sample.
It absolutely abrades the teeth faster than the cement, but rats are very social creatures. The point is that the Tupperware doesn’t stand a chance against even a single rat.
Chap never heard of tupperware apparently.
Rats can chew through cement.
No way. Really? That can’t be much softer than their teeth.
Their teeth continually grow, and cement (not concrete) is not that hard to abrade away.
Yeah, sand definitely is much harder than teeth (which in a normal vertebrate are based on apatite, at a Mohs hardness of 5). If it’s abrasion, that explains a bit, although it’s going to be much slower than an actual cutting action. A quick search indicates cement is at Mohs 5-7, so you theoretically could chew through an unusually soft sample.
It absolutely abrades the teeth faster than the cement, but rats are very social creatures. The point is that the Tupperware doesn’t stand a chance against even a single rat.
You could also go with metal or stone, like an actual vault, but we both thought of tupperware. Go figure.