In case you’re still lost as to what the heck is going on, a Scientology Run is when people film themselves charging into a Church of Scientology building to see how far they can get before being caught and booted out. It’s a notoriously secretive religion, so it turns the whole place into an action-movie set piece where the protagonist is trying to infiltrate a compound while fending off its legion of foot soldiers, clad in terrifying white button-ups with black vests.
Sounds like something a religious person would say to feel like their religion is more sensible.
It’s absolutely a cult. Ex enforcer Mike Rinder himself called Scientology an intelligence gathering organisation.
Religion, cult, intelligence gathering… none mutually exclusive.
Give it a few more generations, and it’ll look like Mormonism (originally an obviously scammy personality cult with a problematic founder, but now a respectable pillar of conservative society). Another century or two and it’ll be like Lutheranism or Episcopalianism: so much part of the background that people don’t even notice the weird stuff in its doctrines.
Scientology isn’t based on an already accepted mainstream religion and they’re losing membership. History rhymes, it doesn’t always repeat.
That should have had an “if it survives long enough”; most weird cults/sects don’t.
I mean, I get that but isn’t LDS considered still a cult? It certainly fits a lot of the criteria.
By who? Other Christian’s or religious people? Typical of them to accuse everyone else of being a cult.
Legally, no.
If you ask anyone sane, all religion is a cult.
By people that study cults and other high control groups, I mean.
All religions are cults.
Yea. What do you think confession is?
It’s pretty well documented that L. Ron Hubbard founded Scientology to serve as a financial tool. Hence the financial controversies and the IRS battles from the 70s-90s
I agree, but that doesn’t prevent a social club from being a religion, does it?
There’s a clear difference between an organisation intentionally created as a cult in living memory and one which, as far as we all know, arose organically from the sincere beliefs of people.
It doesn’t make the beliefs of one more true or something, it’s just a useful categorisation.
You just said the difference is time and the fact no one can remember the religions founding. Which is no clear difference at all.
Time tends to sand off the rough edges of any organization that wants to keep pulling in new members and that doesn’t need a framework of total control to protect itself from fizzling out early. It’s an evolutionary process, not just historical whitewashing. Though it’s also historical whitewashing.
Well that’s not quite what I said. But either way, I think it’s pretty clear. What are some examples you think lie in the grey area?
Mentally ill people have sincere beliefs too.
Well the thing is, it’s a cult.
They all are though tbf
Well yes, especially given that the Catholic church is basically (for a given value of ‘basically’) a continuation of the Roman empire, a financial instrument clothed in religion. Same as Scientology.
There’s different types of names for a group depending on certain variables. Not all cults are religions.
The difference between a cult and a religion is that in a cult the person at the top of the pyramid scheme knows it’s all a bullshit grift and everyone else is a true believer, it’s a religion when that person dies.
I didn’t say that though did I? I said all religions are cults.
True. I’m not sure what my point was, honestly.