Is it webscrapers?

Except they’re he censorship party, not their opponents, so the only way this could be true is if they stop posting content. Utopia

Not how language works. This artist just had a strip mocking prescriptive linguists too.

deleted by creator

Supposedly the people paid to rate responses are already using AI

The message is clear without knowing the reference though

I don’t know about living costs in the US but sounds like you’re answering your own question?

In practice “excellent service” too often means being a white girl with no ring.

Raise your prices and pay servers fairly and equally.

I don’t know whether I agree with all of these, but the list is probably longer and there will be many good ideas. That doesn’t mean total nonprivacy is possible, or a good idea.

The best ideas in your list are probably more about transparency in low-trust environments, rather than personal privacy.

Yeah but we’re talking about your idea now.

We don’t need to reach utopia, but the supposed benefits of total nonprivacy only come when it’s total. Then it’ll never happen, as long as someone benefits from hiding.

Econ 101 is about the benefits af free market. All the classes after are about why it can’t be achieved and how to deal with that.

That’s not an ideology, that’s a dream. It’s trivially true, but it doesn’t apply to the real world. Nothing you do can bring reality closer to that, and you’ll just open yourself to harm.

LLM is fine to say, not more awkward than element. And it is AI.

And I wish we’d call phones computers. It’s been very profitable for corps for people to not realize that they are.

Don’t forget the AI bubble is also a ram and SSD bubble.

It took 4 years for an impoverished Germany, and they were committed to all out war. So 4 years doesn’t sound silly.

Also this article is about it actually happening now, not a prediction

How long do you think draining a country’s economy takes?

Not in a “Darwinian moment”, like the CEO says. Then healthy social structures can be decisive.

Survival of the fittest is about species, not individuals. He’s saying AI is a threat to the human race.

Except it is a fairly good artifice of grass.

Good for what? Looking at? It’s not gonna satisfy a goat.

We only care for the look (“the output”), and we don’t expect more of it, or sell it for more than it is. That’s why it’s not a controversial term for astroturf. It wasn’t controversial for AI either until very recently. In 60 years of AI nobody has split hairs over output of intelligence. It’s justified but weirdly misdirected anger.

AI is a perfectly cromulent word for the thing.

Do you question the grass part of artificial grass? It’s obviously not grass.

Imho nothing wrong with AI use by professionals, as long as it’s verified. That obviously wasn’t the case.