lad

If you define it by intent, then the same action performed by different people may be and not be torture. This makes it pretty hard to define, and it becomes completely subjective after that.

For instance, I don’t think it is possible to torture an inanimate object, thus I never have an intent of causing suffer to one. Sometimes I want to break an object, and by your definition it will not be torture however I do that

A rock is almost like a tortoise in disguise

Would be interesting to know if the driver kept breaking laws afterwards

I’d say, you are correct, but nothing of that applies to US prisons, which is maybe why the discussion started, idk

I wonder if the parent could’ve just accompanied them and returned in the same Uber, it’s not even a new ride back

Yeah, navigation there is pain

This I at least can comprehend, as H is silent in some languages

I sometimes see it with words I can’t even start guessing, can’t remember which, but I think last time it was something starting with M or N after ‘an’

Reading through the comments, I remembered my first day on my second ever job, where we were instructed to turn off computers and power strips too, at the end of the day. When I turned mine off at the end of the day, I found out other power strips were using mine, so I turned off other people’s machines. Unfortunately, the guy that gave us the instructions was first to leave in the evening and hadn’t have his machine turned off that way.

Also remembered that I once broke production server (maybe it didn’t get to production, can’t remember) by adding a single line of log, I didn’t notice that what I was logging was computationally intense, so it halted everything eventually, but it was barely reviewed because it’s just one log line

Petrol is for the driver

There are dedicated online tools for that, that use the federation data an expose it, afaik. I don’t remember any links though, don’t see much use for that except for obsessing over ‘karma’

To me it didn’t read as blaming more like ‘of course people from a different era 250 years ago couldn’t have guessed that, it’s stupid to expect otherwise’

Makes sense. Also agree on the last part

Oh, I saw a documentary about that, Sand or something

Shit, this is an amazingly depressive development

Good point, I should remember it

I like how the cat is being a cat and refuses to co-operate

I think, it did not, but people consider this logic more flawed these days. I would say the joke is layered and it’s not bad only on a few layers while being offensive on others, achieving the goal by any means being one of the bad ones

Oh, but you don’t understand, it’s filtering all the good parts, so that you can share with your peers, or ingest it once again yourself /S

Absolutely, and although they did re-invent Fogbank, it took almost 100 millions, makes me wonder what would it cost to keep the knowledge from disappearing in the first place

For me the comment is still there, weird